Don’t let military slide into obscurity, warns Canadian senator

ANNIE SILVESTER/Bullet News

There is always the potential for a disconnect between the Canadian public and its military which must be guarded against, says a former broadcast journalist and member of the Senate.

Pamela Wallin says she is concerned that with the combat mission in Afghanistan over, it would be easy for the public to develop an “out-of-sight, out-of mind” attitude toward the military.



“We have to make sure that the ties between our citizens and our military do not disappear,” Wallin told the crowd during an address Monday at the Scotiabank Convention Centre in Niagara Falls. “That’s why we’re here today. We have to know why a country has a military. You have to know where you’re freedoms come from and sometimes we lose that connection…so it is up to us.  Leadership and maintaining this connection … is the responsibility of all of us.”

Wallin, chairwoman of the Senate’s National Security and Defence Committee and member of the Veterans Affairs and International Trade Committee, was the keynote speaker at an event hosted by the Garrison Community Council of Niagara, an organization dedicated to building closer connections between Canadians and the military.

“The disconnect is somehow tied to the fact that when you’re in combat it’s on the news every night … and people tend to connect. But the larger issue is when it’s not that the folks who are in our public life like our MPs, our senators, our leaders … they don’t have those direct ties and connections to the military.  They don’t think about it.”

That’s a far cry from the days when large portions of the House of Commons and the senate were filled with veterans who had actually served and “appreciated what the Canadian Forces means to our national interests.

“During World War One, one-tenth of our population signed up to serve. And after the war the veterans continued to play a prominent part in our society. But pretty soon the Second World Wars and the Koreas started fading from memory.”

Wallin cited several changes that contributed to the further separation of military ideals with the public, including the new peace-keeping ideology, which started in the 50s, and the unification of the Canadian forces, which began in the days of the Pearson government and killed off many reserves. She said the disappearance of military programs from university campuses during the Vietnam War further marginalized soldiers from the population at large.

“Again this vital citizen-military link at our universities, at that crucial age was just disappearing and has not yet been re-established.”

Even the end of the Soviet Union was led some to question the need for an expensive military.

“There seemed to be fewer enemies and defence was seen as a lesser priority and so the 90’s in order to balance the books the government drastically and disproportionately cut military spending.”

Wallin quoted former Canadian Gen. Rick Hillier, who called the 1990’s “the decade of darkness” as funding and public support dried up.

She told the group it was only after 9/11 that things began to turn around when the Canadian forces were engaged in going after the Taliban and helping to rebuild Afghanistan that public opinion turned to one of support for the troops.

She said the Canadian military helped build 52 schools in Afghanistan since 9/11, and assisted in essential skill building for many by teaching locals basic literacy skills.

“When those kids go back to their own communities with the ability to pick up a pen and write a letter or fill out a form, they are now the hero in their community – not the drug lord and not the Taliban leader.”

Return to FRONT PAGE.

Print Friendly

One Comment on "Don’t let military slide into obscurity, warns Canadian senator"

  1. Gord November 27, 2012 at 11:13 am · Reply

    “Veterans Affairs alters conclusions of medical reports to deny Disability Benefits”

    Part 1

    Ex Canadian Forces Member. While serving in the Canadian Forces imagine 16 months away from your family, having occasional numbness in your feet after patrolling all day with 40 – 50 lbs of gear, then one day you feel a strange sensation in your chest, your heart beat is irregular, all of a sudden you feel en enormous weight on every part of your body and you collapse onto your knees, unable to lift your arms, your breathing slows and blackness begins to narrow your vision …. you wake up disoriented and with a sharp pain in your shoulder. A few months later your driving to work, you begin to experience stabbing abdominal pains, your hands and feet go numb, instantaneously sweat begins to pour off your head, you feel nauseated and then your breathing slows. Suddenly your entire body is charged with electricity and every muscle begins to contract, then your head and chest are resting against the steering wheel, you are confused and uncertain of your location. 20 months after leaving the Canadian Forces you’ve spent more than 4 months in bed, called 911 on 4 different occasions and spent more than 30 days in multiple hospitals while neurologists, cardiologists, respiratory and gastrointestinal specialists run hundreds of tests and invasive procedures. Without any clear cause you become short of breath just standing up, you drop utensils, phones, glasses and other items and are unable to button up your shirts because you can’t feel the ends of your fingers. You are frequently unable to drive or walk when the dizziness and nausea becomes severe. Without any notice you suddenly feel extremely fatigued and your legs and arms become weak and you have to lye down wherever you are, even in a vehicle. Occasionally you feel a strange sensation down your spine and collapse on the floor, completely paralyzed. These are just a few of the challenges I now face, here is my story:
    I was on duty with the Canadian Forces in 2009 when I received the H1N1 shot (AREPANRIX by GSK GlaxoSmithKline) and had a severe adverse reaction resulting in PERMANENT symptoms: dizziness, vertigo, irregular heart rhythms, shortness of breath, muscle weakness, pain and cramps, numbness in hands and feet, vision problems and severe fatigue. My physical fitness changed from special forces fit to that of a 70 year old in a matter of days. I advised the military doctors that my change in health occurred immediately following the H1N1 vaccination and although they noted my concerns on 8 different occasions, they did not investigate the link or file an adverse reaction report. According to CF Health Services (CFHS) they are required to report adverse reactions to Health Canada. There was no record of this report in my medical file. According to Health Canada there were 5,712 adverse reactions reported across Canada. The DND and CF filed only 9 reports, 5 had neurological symptoms. Due to the severity of my symptoms I was unable to continue performing my duties and was released from the military. Following my release, the military determined I was disabled and altered my release record due to the severity of my symptoms. Two years later Alberta’s health officer in charge of the Immunization Program for the province reviewed my medical history and verified I had a severe adverse reaction to the H1N1 vaccine. I applied to Veterans Affairs (VA) for benefits through both their pension and rehabilitation programs, providing proof of vaccination, a letter from both Alberta Health Services (AHS) Immunization and another doctor verifying I had an adverse reaction and was denied on 3 separate occasions. Even though I was on duty training personnel when I received the vaccination, Veterans Affairs stated “There is no evidence that your barriers to reestablishment are related to your service time”. In an attempt to understand their decision in order to appeal it I asked them why they felt this injury was not related to military service. First the case manger advised me they did not have the authority to make a decision on my rehabilitation application. When I advised the case manager that a different case manager and a client service agent both told me they did have the authority, she then stated they simply did not want to provide rehabilitation benefits in case the pension division denied pension benefits based on the same criteria. They advised me to appeal to their national office or wait 9 – 12 months or longer until the pension division makes a decision. I asked why I should be denied rehabilitation and continue to suffer severe symptoms which can be treated when they can make a decision immediately. Again the case manager did not respond. Since they believe the injury was not service-related, I then asked for their definition of “service related” so that I could understand how to appeal the decision and they refused to answer the question and told me to contact the Bureau of Pension Advocates (BPA) who could assist with the appeal process. Again I told the case manager that it is difficult to appeal a decision if you don’t know why the injury is not considered service related. I then advised the case manager that I had contacted the Bureau and was told they they are only involved in pension applications and cannot review or comment on rehabilitation appeals.  The case manager then told me she was not aware of this and when I asked her who would assist me in my appeal again she could not provide an answer.

    “Veterans Affairs alters conclusions of medical reports to deny Disability Benefits”

    Part 2

    I then asked if I was immunized while on active duty in Afghanistan and suffered an injury as a result would it be considered service-related and the case manager stated “yes, it would”. I pointed out the double standard which the case manager agreed with but she still refused to acknowledge my injury was service-related. Another case manager told me the main concern of Veterans Affairs was, if they approved the rehabilitation application and the pension application was denied, they would not be able to cut off my benefits until I reach the age of 65. Next I asked if they recognized the validity of the information from Alberta Health Services verifying I had a serious adverse reaction to the H1N1 vaccination. Again the case manager refused to answer the question but stated symptoms are not the same as adverse reactions. I then attempted to educate the case manager explaining adverse reactions are undesirable symptoms according to Health Canada and the vaccine manufacturer GSK. Incredibly, the case manager continued to disagreed advising me that even though I may have had an adverse reaction that my symptoms are not related to the adverse reaction. After arguing with the case manager over the definition of “service related” and adverse reactions versus symptoms, she told me to contact Alberta Health Services and use their rehabilitation programs instead of Veterans Affairs because VA programs are meant to get members back to work and are not for the permanently disabled. In fact she advise me Alberta Health Services will pay for all the rehabilitation that I require. I asked to speak with the Veterans Affairs doctor who advised the case manager regarding the adverse reaction and was provided his name and was told he was not in the office this week. Through the College of Physicians and Surgeons in Alberta website I was able to instantly identified him as a General Practitioner with no specialty in immunization and obtained his direct phone number within Veterans Affairs. I immediately called and was prompted with a message advising me he was on the phone and to leave a message which I did. To date he has not returned my call which was not a surprise to me. Following a previous pension application that was denied, I obtained the medical report from the Veterans Affairs doctor who reviewed my file which stated my injury was also not related to service, however he ignored medical information from several of my doctors, altered the conclusion of one of several of my neurologists reports and then claimed there was no agreement on my diagnosis, which became grounds for denying the application. He then speculated in his report that had the military determined my diagnosis was related to service there was no medical treatment that would relieve my symptoms. According to the College of Physicians and Surgeons this doctor is listed as a general surgeon with no specialties in neurology or other disciplines. When I asked the case manager why the information from my doctors were not used in evaluating the validity of my application, especially when Veterans Affairs specifically requested it and paid my doctors to provide the reports, I was told Veterans Affairs took the position they did not have to use it and chose not to. I forwarded the Veterans Affairs Medical Report to my neurologist whose conclusions were altered by the Veterans Affairs doctor. Incredibly my neurologist called me on the weekend and advised me the Veterans Affairs doctors conclusions were false, that he did not have the authority and professional experience to reinterpreted his report. Clearly he was annoyed and stated the Veterans Affairs doctor should have consulted a specialist who was familiar with my condition and symptoms. Veterans Affairs admitted the doctor had made errors, but refused to review the original application advising me to appeal the decision through an Administrative Review which would take another 6 – 8 months. In 2012 I have been bedridden for more than 2 months, housebound most days, spent more than $10,000 paying for medication, therapy and specialized equipment to assist in my daily living and to manage my symptoms. I am now unable to afford the specialized physiotherapy which costs thousands of dollars each year and am unable to work due to my disability. I have written to the Minister of Veterans Affairs. To date, no response has been received.

Leave a Comment

Please note: JavaScript is required to post comments.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

About the Author

Bullet News Niagara

Bullet News Niagara is a division of Line 2 Revenue Systems Inc.. It is an independent, interactive, Niagara-based website featuring news, opinion, commentary and debate that you won’t find anywhere else in this region. We are locally owned and committed to fearless, accurate journalism unencumbered by special interests of any kind. We are also committed to our readers. Don't hesitate to contact us with suggestions, comments, ideas and tips. We're here for you. Be part of the conversation.